President Donald Trump signed an executive action on Tuesday targeting the law firm representing former special counsel Jack Smith, revoking the security clearances of attorneys who assisted Smith during his investigations into Trump.
The order specifically impacts Covington & Burling LLP, stripping its lawyers of security clearance and directing the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to review any government contracts held by the firm.
Covington & Burling confirmed it is representing Smith in a personal capacity, and a source familiar with the matter stated there is no evidence that the firm was involved in Smith’s criminal investigations into Trump.
The memo marks a major escalation in Trump’s campaign against individuals and entities he views as political adversaries.
“One law firm that provided pro bono legal services to the special counsel’s office under Jack Smith’s leadership was Covington & Burling,” White House Staff Secretary Will Scharf said during the signing ceremony. “As a result, we are suspending and reviewing the security clearances for attorneys and employees at that firm who worked with Jack Smith’s team. We will continue holding those responsible for the weaponization of government accountable.”
Trump then asked Scharf whether similar actions would be taken against other law firms. Scharf responded that the administration was considering a range of options.
Tossing his pen to an attendee, Trump quipped, “Why don’t you give it to Jack Smith?” before calling the special counsel a “deranged” individual.
When a reporter questioned whether the move amounted to political targeting, Trump interrupted, “I’ve been targeted for four years—longer than that. So, don’t tell me about targeting. I was the target of corrupt politicians for four years, and then four more years after that. So don’t talk to me about targeting.”
The executive action underscores Trump’s continued effort to dismantle institutions and individuals linked to past investigations into his presidency. While the legal ramifications of the order remain uncertain, the decision further intensifies tensions between the administration and the legal community.
