Documents released so far in the Justice Department’s ongoing disclosure of files related to Jeffrey Epstein have not revealed evidence of wrongdoing by prominent or powerful individuals, falling short of the expectations held by many who advocated for the records’ release.

The DOJ said Friday that the full set of materials—including photographs and court documents—would not be made public immediately, despite a legal requirement to do so. Officials cited the need for a careful review process to protect the identities and privacy of Epstein’s victims.

Democratic lawmakers criticized the limited scope of the release, which included only minimal references to President Donald Trump. Some of Trump’s critics have speculated about how frequently the president appears in the Epstein files, pointing to his past friendship with the disgraced financier before their relationship ended around 2004. Trump, for his part, has accused several prominent Democrats of having ties to Epstein.

California Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna, a co-author of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, posted a video on X arguing that the DOJ’s release fails to meet the law’s requirements.

“Our law requires them to explain redactions,” Khanna said. “There is not a single explanation.”

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said on Friday that there has been “no effort” to withhold Trump’s name from the documents and said any records referencing the president will be released in the coming weeks, provided they comply with legal standards.