Bobrisky Appeals Conviction, Seeks Fine Instead of Jail Time for Naira Abuse Charges

Idris Olanrewaju Okuneye, popularly known as Bobrisky, has filed a notice of appeal challenging his recent conviction on charges of Naira abuse.
The controversial cross-dresser and socialite is contesting the six-month imprisonment sentence imposed on him by Justice Abimbola Awogboro of the Federal High Court, Lagos, on April 12, 2024, seeking to replace it with a fine of Fifty Thousand Naira (N50,000) for each count.
Bobrisky’s appeal, filed by his lawyer Bimbo Kusanu, argues that the trial court erred in imposing the maximum sentence without considering his lack of previous criminal convictions and the option for lesser penalties under the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA).
Despite pleading guilty to the four-count charge brought against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on April 5, Bobrisky maintains that the punitive nature of the sentence contradicts the mandatory sentencing guidelines outlined in the ACJA.
The appellant highlights his positive antecedents, including his cooperation with the EFCC during the investigation, as factors that should have been taken into account by the trial court.
Part of the decision of the lower court complained of are “The sentence of the Lower Court that imposed maximum penalty of six-months imprisonment without option of fine on the Appellant who is a first time convict without previous record of criminal conviction.
“The Learned trial Judge erred in Law and in facts by his imposition of the maximum sentence of 6 Months imprisonment terms against the Appellant without option of fine contrary to the provisions of Section 416(2) d of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act of 2015 (“ACJA”) that prescribed the mandatory guidelines on the trial Court on imposition of sentencing after criminal conviction of a first time offender as the Appellant.
“The trial Court imposed the maximum sentence on the Appellant who has no previous record criminal of conviction when there are options to impose a lesser sentence by the provisions of the ADCJA.
“The Sentence imposed by the trial Court against the Appellant is punitive contrary to the mandatory provisions of the Law (ACJA) on sentencing.
“The Appellant has suffered miscarriage of Justice by the maximum sentence imposed by the learned trial Court.
“The reasons adduced by the learned trial Court for the imposition of maximum punishment on the Appellant which is essentially on what foreigners think of abuse of Naira,is perverse and is out of tune with the reality of what the trial Court should have been considered to impose maximum punishment on the Appellant.
“The intendment of the provisions of the Central Bank Act 2007 that the Appellant was charged with is for Nigerians not to tamper with Naira and not what nationals of foreign countries view about tampering with Naira.
“The trial Court did not consider the positive antecedent of the Appellant who did not waste the precious Judicial resources of the trial Court when he pleaded guilty to the Charge. The Appellant honoured the invitation of the Respondent-Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on the first invitation during the investigation leading to the charge”.
“The trial Court failed to exercise his discretion judiciously and judicially in sentencing the Appellant. which has occasioned miscarriage of justice against the Appellant.”
Consequently, he urged the court to set aside the 6 months maximum imprisonment sentence imposed on him and in its place impose fine of N50,000 ( Fifty Thousand Naira) on each of the counts against the Appellant.
Kindly share this story:
Kindly share this story:
Share on whatsapp
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on telegram
Share on facebook
Top News

Related Articles